|
|
| 3. Can imagery be addressed
in new ways with on-line methods? Can a collective discussion of
imagery produce more scholarly knowledge than just an individual
analysis? Is it possible to analyze electronic images in a scholarly
manner without examining the material object? texture of the paper?
printing technique? style? color? |
| |
 |
Advantage
of examining the material object Jack Censer, 6-1-03,
3:33 PM |
|
|
the material object Lynn
Hunt, 6-23-03, 10:52 PM |
|
|
RE: Advantage of examining
the material object Vivian Cameron,
7-6-03, 6:28 PM |
|
On-line Collaboration Wayne
Hanley, 6-6-03,
9:53 AM |
|
On-line Collaboration Barbara
Day-Hickman, 7-1-03,
4:22 PM |
|
 |
RE: On-line Collaboration Joan
B. Landes,
7-14-03, 3:28 PM |
|
zooming on images Warren
Roberts, 7-2-03, 2:08 PM |
|
on-line collaboration Vivian
Cameron, 7-6-03,
6:35 PM |
|
on material objects and
digital technology Joan B. Landes,
7-12-03, 5:33 PM |
|
Final thoughts Warren
Roberts, 7-19-03, 8:03 AM |
|
on-line collaboration Barbara
Day-Hickman,
7-24-03, 4:28 PM |
|
|
|
|
| Subject: |
RE: On-line
Collaboration |
| Posted
By: |
Joan Landes |
|
| Date
Posted: |
7-14-03, 3:28
PM |
|
I share both
Barbara’s and Wayne’s optimism about
the enormous scholarly potential of digital technology.
Adoption of the model already in place in the sciences,
however, will require a reconsideration of existing standards
and even definitions of humanistic scholarship. If “posting” amounts
to a new kind of publication or pre-publication – in
which others can view the changes to one’s work
resulting from external comments and before a work is “published” in
the conventional sense – how will this impact our
evaluation of individual creativity? Will completion
of a work continue to be prioritized? Can we find better
mechanisms to appraise seriously a person’s work
in progress? How can we protect scholars from the risk
of a public exposure of ignorance and error, or from
an erroneous charge directed (publicly) against their
work? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
