|
|
2. What are the advantages/deficits of
visual mediation of events and concepts in this period? Can images
provide knowledge that is distinctive and different from textual
sources? How do images either correspond with or differ from their
textual commentary? What does this reveal about the combination of
image and text? Can representations by their nature capture popular
attitudes? Are inherent male/female upper class/popular class tensions
either captured or effaced in these images? |
|
|
question
2 Warren
Roberts, 6-9-03, 9:50 AM |
|
|
|
RE:
question 2 Jack Censer, 6-10-03, 1:05 AM |
|
|
|
|
RE:
question 2 Warren Roberts,
7-2-03,
9:53 AM |
|
|
|
RE: question
2 Barbara
Day-Hickman, 7-1-2003,
3:17 PM |
|
|
|
RE: question
2 Warren Roberts, 7-2-03, 12:53 PM |
|
|
|
RE:
question 2 Jack Censer,
7-26-03,
10:17 PM |
|
|
question
2 Vivian Cameron,
7-6-03, 6:05 PM |
|
|
Final
thoughts Warren
Roberts, 7-18-03, 5:38 AM |
|
|
Subject: |
Final thoughts |
Posted
By: |
Warren Roberts |
|
Date
Posted: |
7-18-03, 5:38
AM |
|
My remarks here are directed to comments by other members of the group; while
they pertain to particular information I hope they have some larger relevance.
I turn first to Barbara’s discussion of the “Massacre dans le Couvent
des Carmes” image, which, on the basis of a formal analysis (I gather)
she feels might have been inspired by David’s “Sabine Women.” She
sees a similar binary division in the two images and wonders if the engraver
of the Massacre image might have developed a Counter-Revolutionary theme
by showing the vulnerability of unarmed priests. For the Massacre image
to have been inspired by David’s Sabine Women it would have to date after
1800, when David first showed it, unless the illustrator who did the Massacre
image saw one of David’s preparatory studies for the painting. In other
words, dates and specific information are essential for Barbara’s analysis
to work. If information of this type supports Barbara’s reading it can
stand as is. Even if the dates don’t work for her analysis, her reading
seems most persuasive to me, at the level of formal analysis. To see the
vulnerability of unarmed priests brings out something central to what the
image is about. This is an image that depicts one of the most heavily censured
events of the Revolution, a breakdown of proper legal forms as mobs, goaded
by demagogues, strike out at the enemies of the Revolution. Showing the
vulnerability of priests in the “Massacre dans le Couvent” brings
out a particular visual response to the September Massacres very nicely,
whenever the image was made. In the case of David’s Sabine Women, we know
a great deal about its genesis, which in turn helps us to understand a
painting that was completed in l799 and exhibited in l800. The idea for
the Sabine Women came to David when he was in prison, having been incarcerated
after the fall of Robespierre. We know from his correspondence, and his
appeals to the Convention, how great his fears were, and we know that he
claimed to regret his role in the violence of the Revolution. Pure of heart,
always motivated by high principles, he said, he had been misled. It was
while he experienced thoughts such as these that the idea came to David
to paint the Sabine Women; this subject conveyed a message, the resolution
of differences and avoidance of conflict, that David wanted to incorporate
into a painting. To compare the Massacre dans le Couvent image and David’s
Sabine Women can be most useful; compositional similarities invite such
a comparison. Specific information about the first of the images is essential
for that analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|